Drop in the Ocean

I am a Writer

John Doe

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit .
Erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper.

  • 3066 Stone Lane, Wayne, Pennsylvania.
  • +610-401-6021, +610-401-6022
  • admin@mydomain.com
  • www.yourdomain.com
Me

My Professional Skills

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat.

Web Design 90%
Web Development 70%
App Development 95%
Wordpress 60%

Awesome features

Aliquam commodo arcu vel ante volutpat tempus. Praesent pulvinar velit at posuere mollis. Quisque libero sapien.

Animated elements

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed tempus cursus lectus vel pellentesque. Etiam tincidunt.

Responsive Design

Pellentesque ultricies ligula a libero porta, ut venenatis orci molestie. Vivamus vitae aliquet tellus, sed mollis libero.

Modern design

Duis ut ultricies nisi. Nulla risus odio, dictum vitae purus malesuada, cursus convallis justo. Sed a mi massa dolor.

Retina ready

Vivamus quis tempor purus, a eleifend purus. Ut sodales vel tellus vel vulputate. Fusce rhoncus semper magna.

Fast support

Suspendisse convallis sem eu ligula porta gravida. Suspendisse potenti. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, duis omis unde elit.

0
completed project
0
design award
0
facebook like
0
current projects
  • Bapsi Sidhwa and cultural differences in her writings

    Bapsi Sidhwa and cultural differences in her writings



    Bapsi Sidwa’s novels provide a wide glimpse of the contemporary political situations and cultural life in the subcontinent. Her novel “Ice-candy man” clearly depicts that she had been a part of cultural multiplicity in the subcontinent. In the novel, she introduced herself as a little girl “Lenny” who was not mature by her age but still sensible enough to catch the whole plight of people belonging to subcontinent into her never-fading memories, not just at an interval level but also at an external point of life. She was accompanied by the people who belonged to different religions and they let her know about the changing circumstances of the subcontinent. In her novel, she has discussed different cultures. Through the depiction of the culture, she makes the reader clear to acknowledge the cultural harmony, cultural hybridization and cultural relativism that existed in the subcontinent at the time of partition. Through the way she highlighted the living style of people, one can interpret that she has also shown the element of cultural ethnocentrism.
    Bapsi Sidhwa spotted the various elements of the culture in her novel. She herself belonged to the Parsee community, which was among the minor religions of the subcontinent. The different cultural elements like symbols, language, customs, traditions, food, festivals, etc of the people belonging to different communities provide us with the cultural differences in the novel.

    CULTURAL DIFFERENCES

    Bapsi Sidhwa gives a number of references on cultural differences; on the other hand, she depicts the cultural harmony and the similarities of the culture among the various communities of the subcontinent. The cultural harmony is highlighted by how different communities used to gather in the park and gossiped. At the very start of the novel, Lenny presents the picture of the people who were seen commenting and flirting with Ayah, those people who belonged to different religions but their behavior was inclined toward homogenized culture. She also represented the harmony of culture in the village life also, when Lenny visited the village” Pir pindo” she described the way Muslims and Sikhs gathered to listen to the radio at Chaudhry’s place. The homogenized culture can also be seen when Lenny says Salaam-alekum Khan Sahib! Though Lenny belongs to the Parsee community but the way she greeted Sharbat khan represents the amalgam and mixture of two cultures. In contrary to this cultural differences among different communities can be drawn through the following elements of culture

  • Romanticism my field of Interest

    Romanticism my field of Interest


     Nature is a healer for those who know the importance of it, but nowadays few people truly appreciate its beauty and think in that way, the competition among the competitors have started a race among the folks, no one has got enough time to take a deep breath calm oneself down and look back and analyze the things, the search for peace has been misinterpreted because it is something you cannot attain by wishing and searching for it but by finding within yourself. Romantics answer this by connecting us within the source that is nature.  
    While discussing this particular age, it started in 1798-1830 and ended in 1832 when Walter Scott died. They were the influencers of the French Revolution, the Industrial Revolution, urbanization, civilization, realism, naturalism, mysticism, humanism, imaginations and many other major incidents that occurred during that era.
     Romantics got popularity especially for the poetry that produced and caught the attention of readers as it did to myself. The suffering, hardships, sorrows, storms, barrenness, hollowness, through the use of natural imagery, is best portrayed by Romantics and as a result, increased their followers. Romantics clear illustration can be seen in Words Worth Poems like The Thorn” and “The Old Beggar, the corruption, hypocrisy, individualism, societal problems can be seen in both poems. Wordsworth has given a true picture and has created a connection between words and the world, the suffering of Maratha Ray in Thorn not only tells us about her journey but also how she healed herself, for her nature served as a protector, rejection from society does not bother her at all, but still, she is being noticed by people even though lacking interest in her surroundings but to her, it remained unnoticed because her inner was satisfied by taking a shield of nature. So, the comparison is drawn among society and the natural world through the use of natural imagery.
    Another the well-known poet Coleridge; working with Wordsworth wrote Lyrical Ballads, also put his step forward and the poems that he wrote attained the readership, one of the famous Poems that leads him towards the peak was Kubla Khan passing through the centuries, it is as alive as it was before. The natural flow in his poems creates a visionary world within the reader’s mind, the dream is depicted in a real way, agreeing upon his philosophy because it is a way better than Words worth as he says your inner effects outer. Wordsworth and Coleridge appear to be two different points connecting with one bridge and that is the bridge of Nature. Even though the difference in their psychology is there but the focus is the same, that is the reason their worth cannot be denied, Subjectivity always remains that is the essence of human beings. And I appreciate this thing because it welcomes my thoughts in this as well.
    Connection of Man with nature is not as much stronger as it was before, The Universe that it contains only recognized by those who have got natural spirit and vision. The natural scenery is lacking due to industrialization, village life that has been replaced by city life, natural scenery replacing artificiality, emotions with firmness, subjectivity with Objectivity, is opposite as it appears in Romantic area but when you read these poems you feel the same as portrayed and you appeal for the same beauty, as Keats adds, ‘’Truth is beauty and beauty is Truth’’. The main reason why I become the admirer of Romantics was their creativity that dragged and pushed me not to go anywhere.

    The soul of a man is in Nature, the essence is impossible without your soul, to enlighten yourself, one has to go through sufferings and feel the subjectivity and come out of numbers, just like humans that do not lie in figures, the stillness of the heart is the stillness of the mind, chirping of a bird is not only a sound but an alarm to wake up from the dreams and make your return to your roots, as John Keats in his poem “The Nightingale” admires the song, and want to infuse and go within his world because to him it is soothing and serving as opium to his sufferings.

    Imagination, fantasy, creativity, intuition has never betrayed a man at the same time, they act as a suggestion to seek out a right path because your Inner self is a universe that is connected with the Supreme power and by following your Intuition unknown paths uncover. And all these qualities have intrigued me as well.

    Man the soul is connected with nature but Man has lost the soul but nature still contains that, by disconnecting departing ourselves with it, man is in state of lamentation, this scenario can be best seen in Wordsworth Poem ‘’ Lines written in Early Spring’’ in which he discusses man versus nature and what man has done to his self.

    To see the sweetness and to realize it one has to see beyond the bounds imposed by our rational mind and which is what Romantics agree upon, the Infinity”, the universe and boundary that a man searching for springs from his source. By connecting to our Core we can find anything that we are looking for. Man becomes alive in this way, by going back again to his Universe. So, by reading this genre, its poetry, we can sketch out and draw a contrast and can relate to ourselves.




  • Polysemy

    Polysemy


    3.     
          Polysemy
    Richards and Schmidt (2002, p.406) define Polysemy as “word having two or more closely related meanings.”  One word having two distinct but related meaning is polysemy.
    For example:
    شاندار                         یہ عمارت بہت شاندار ہے
    شاندار      آج کھلاڑیوں نے بہت شاندار کھیل کھیلا۔

    In this example, in first sentence the word is used in terms of “beauty/elegant”, while the same word in the second sentence is used by the native speakers in terms of “good”.
    چلو    =            چلو ٹھیک ہے   
    چلو    =   چلو لاہور چلتے ہیں۔
    Here in this example the first sentence is used by the people of Urdu language to say “it’s fine”, while in the second sentence the same word is used to say “let’s go”.

  • Homonymy, Homophony and Homograph with Urdu Examples

    Homonymy, Homophony and Homograph with Urdu Examples



    1.      Homonymy:
    “Words which are written in the same way and sound alike but which have different meanings.” Richards and Schmidt (2002, p.241). The words that have the same sound and different spelling and gives different meaning is a homophone. And the words that have the same sound, same spelling but the different meaning is a homograph. Those words which have the same phonological form are called homophony and those which have the same orthographical structure are called homograph.
    For example:
    1.Homophony:
    The words that have the same sound and different spelling and gives a different meaning is homophone. For example:
    سدا  (ہمیشہ)                                      سدا خوش رہو             
    صدا  (آواز)                               فقیر نے صدا دی            
                The first one means "always", while the second word used is "to address or to call
    ابد  (ہمیشہ)                          تا ابد سلامت رہو               
    عبد (بندہ)              حقوق و العباد کا خاص خیال رکھیں۔         
              
     
          الیم (دکھ)       قیامت کے روز گنہگاروں کو عذاب الیم ہو گا           
    علیم (جاننے والا)              اللہ علیم ہے۔              
                  

    عام            میں ایک عام آدم ہوں ۔             (common)
                آم (پھل                               میں نے آم کھایا۔


    میرے حلق میں درد ہے۔       حلق  (گلا)          
    خلق                خدارہ خلق خدا پر رحم کرو          

                In the last example of homophony the first word here means “throat” while in the second sentence the word means “people”. These are the examples of homophony taken from Urdu language.
    2.Homograph:
    The words that have the same sound, same spelling but the different meaning is a homograph. For example:
    سہر (صبح)     میں سہر کے اوقات میں ورزش کرتا ہوں۔          
    اسے دیکھ کے میں سہر میں مبتلا ہو گیا۔       سہر  (جادو)    
           
    الم  (جھنڈا)                          اسلام کا الم بلند رکھو۔           
    الم  (دکھ، رنج)          اس کی جدائ میرے لیۓ المناک ثابت ہوئ۔       
           
     قلم                                (یہ میرا قلم ہے)            
             قلم      (بادشاہ نے سر قلم کرنے کا حکم دیا۔)           

         بند (close)               (یہ دروازہ صبح بند ہو گا۔)           
    بند (bank)                (دریا کا بند ٹوٹ گیا۔)             
    The words used in sentences here are homographs.

  • Hyponymy with Urdu Examples

    Hyponymy with Urdu Examples






    Hyponymy
    According to Richards and Schmidt (2002, p.243), hyponymy is “a relationship between two words, in which the meaning of one of the words includes the meaning of the other words.” Hyponymy deals with the relationship of inclusion.
    For instance, tulip and rose are hyponyms of a flower. خرگوش (rabbit) is a part of جانور (animal), so here (rabbit) is the hyponymy of (animal).
    پھول:       گلاب     موتیا     چمبیلی
    جانور:  گاۓ    چیتا     بکری
    These all are hyponyms of flowers and animals respectively.


  • Synonymy with Urdu Examples

    Synonymy with Urdu Examples



    Synonymy
    Richards and Schmidt (2002, p.533) defines synonymy as “a word which has the same sense, or nearly the same as another word”. Synonyms can be defined as words that are different in sound and spelling but are same in meaning.

    Examples from the Urdu language:
      /دکھ 'رنج

    درخت  / پیڑ

    وقت  / ساعت

    مسرت/ خوشی

    توک/  بھروسہ

    /خاوند،میاں/شوہر

    Here in this example all words are identical to each other which shares the same meaning i.e sadness and these words are synonyms to each other. Similarly, the Urdu words used to call father are      
    والدابو
     these words are also synonymy




  • Connotations

    Connotations



    The connotation is a quality or an idea that a word makes you think of that is more than its basic meaning. The connotation is a secondary meaning which is beyond its dictionary meaning or explicit denotation. The meanings are often emotional and have a range of associations. 
    These meanings are implied by the speaker or writer and are inferred by the listener or reader. M.H. Abraham differentiated between Connotation and Denotation. According to him the denotation of a word is its reference or primary signification whereas its connotation is the range of secondary or associated significations which it commonly implies and suggests. “Horse” and “Steed” refers to the same quadruped, but “Steed” has a different connotation which is derived from the romantic or chivalric narratives in which this word was often used. Similarly, “Home” refers to the house where one lives, but connotes intimacy, privacy and coziness Words can be used for positive and negative connotation depending on the contextual situation. The use of words is for making good and bad sense, feelings, impressions, expression, etc. for example, advertisers and politicians may use words with positive connotations while expressing their message attractively.

     A word with a negative connotation may be used to describe an unpleasant feeling. Pleasant or positive connotations are also called honorific, while negative ones are called pejorative. Pejorative connotations may also refer to a “polite” words versus an “impolite” word though both mean a fairly negative phenomenon (Gowers, 1987). Lexicology studies two essential aspects of word meaning; “denotative” which is the factual and intellectual meaning and “connotative” which is emotional and evaluative meaning. There are at least three types of connotations mentioned in linguistic literature (Cruse, 1997): power solidarity, evaluative and associative(metaphor). One and the same word may have positive or negative connotations according to the speaker/listener (gender, educational level, religion, nationality, sociolinguistic factors of age, social class, political and general views have to be taken into consideration) and situational context. Gairns and Redman highlight this thesis with examples of usage of the word “liberal”
  • Madman by Khalil Jibran

    Madman by Khalil Jibran


    Madman is the person who unfolds the reality of life, his imagination is out of the reach of a layman, he is the one who can foresee the future. His perception extraordinary that is why he is considered a madman in society. Khalil Gibran was a mystic sort of person, it is erroneous to say him a clinically mad because he was not for sure, he was identified as a madman among his people because of his confrontation of reality.
    Khalil Gibran in his first prose-poetry 'How I became a madman' confesses about his reality towards this world and how he was perceived by the people just like Zarathustra; a prophet, when he came down upon the mountains, he was misunderstood and people started calling him a madman but once he realizes that he has come before time, he again went to the mountains, so here we see similarities between Khalil Gibran madness with him, as he says in his poem,
     'when every mask that was of illusion uncovered from my face, for the first time sun kissed me and see the sky and when I reached the market place people start calling me a madman but for me, it was real me because that glorified and enhanced my imagination and introduced me with the new reality of life, this was the point when I woke up from a dream and see the authenticity of life, those who were calling me a madman I become isolated from them because they were the arena build by society to hide their own identity.
    Gibran has criticized the society by using the concept of madness, to him people who wear masks for their approval in society are a madman and who uncovers and destroy these masks and real people. in the poem 'Wise king' we can see how he introduced us to the society that considers king a madman, forking they were the madman. In his poems, we can foresee through his insight into the true picture of society.
    'The sleepwalkers' exhibits the hypocrisy of family as well as the mask that we wear and instantly our conscious mind alarms us and prohibits us not to approach reality in a way we consider, as in this poem we see mother while their sleep reveals to his daughter that your youthfulness has diminished my youth but as they woke up she says 'dear' and conscious mind prevails over her and restrict to say.  We also see how society is exposed in front of us that is demanding justice and misunderstanding the message of the Holy book. in the poem 'The blessed city' madman goes and sees that everyone is lacking one leg and arm, everyone's one body part is missing after requiring from them, he analysis he and children are the only one who has full body parts, inquiring some knowledge he comes to know that they have misunderstood the message of God and those who consider him a madman were themselves mad because they had closed their eyes to encrypt the real message.
    A madman is a person who lives beyond any limits, he can see what is happening around because he is not living in the hallucination, when he tries to make them restless he got hit by. madness open his consciousness and make him more alert about the surroundings. As Gibran blessed those thieves who stole his mask, because mask blurs everything, a person who is a madman is not rebellious but as people don't accept him he isolates from society or evolves himself to their reality that is Maya. as in 'The wise king' when witch adds poison in the well, everyone, by drinking it becomes an illusion base person and king with his chamberlain only remain real which is for them a madness and they called them a madman but because of lust for power king with his companion drinks that water to adopt themselves in their masks. here we can see how society has been satirized those who once sing the songs of the king now revolting. society's aspect from its inhabitants to walk in their footsteps and whoever disobeys called a madman, in other words, you are not allowed to think out of the box. As in 'Crucifixion', we see that madman demands from his society to crucify him because he has confronted the reality and he knows these people are mere toys of their own rules and are blind enough to foresee, right after his killing he gets free because it is his freedom that he has exercised through the force of his words. madman 
    'when I become a madman' and in 'crucifixion' we can see that people have lowered their heads and when masks uncover, they see beyond their limits for the first time, the writer has satirized the society.
  • Motherese

    Motherese




    Language learning is a complex process, every child goes through different kind of processes before speaking a language, the surrounding in which child lives plays an important role in his language learning. If he does not receive input during that stage he may not be able to speak in a proper way again, in case of genie, who was 12-year-old, she was kept apart from his surrounding and given a separate room, as a result, she was unable to produce language although the language was taught to him it was useless because she remains unsuccessful in producing fluent speak. First two years of a child plays an important role in child acquisition.

    Furthermore, children have their own grammar, in which they construct their own grammatical speaking patterns. They do not imitate or speak through reinforcement but they speak because of their own innate ability which enables them to differentiate between them. In a critical period, if a child does not receive input, then it is very difficult for him/her to speak again, this is the reason it is a critical period.
    This is the period during which the child receives input from his caretakers, relatives or anyone person who is speaking to him/her. Motherese plays an important role in establishing children's language and in building his own sentences. Although, children do not imitate mothers plays a quintessential role because it is the input that helps the child.
    Motherese does not mean that only children mother talk to him any person can talk to the baby and respond to motherese rather than adult speech, children prefer motherese because it is less complex, and also it is simple and it is easy for them to understand. Here comes another point that is of children comprehension is better than their production of speech, there are shreds of evidence which proves that children comprehension is better, for example, if a caretaker talks to a child, he understands him because he responds to them through certain postures and gestures.
    Motherese is a language that the parents or caretakers use to communicate with a child even when the child is not capable of understanding or producing those sounds or words. This is a pre-linguistic stage, in which the child learns different words or languages by the people who talk to him in his surroundings.

    We were asked to conduct a research about the features of Motherese and their application in various communities (Pakistan, America, United Kingdom, Afghanistan, Chinese and Swedish, Philippine). The features of, motherese include object permanence which states that caretaker talk to children only about the things which are present around them.
    exaggerated / high/ raised phonologies; in parentheses stress in words is also used so that the children may better be understood.
    Pauses: pauses are used repeatedly so children may better have understood
    repetitions, words repetition is the common characteristics of parentheses,
     elision, there is an absence or elision means unstressed sounds remain omitted and more focus is on stress syllable.
     substitutions,
    lack of poverty of stimulus and behavioristic stances, in any background children, are taken, they will learn the language.
     use of simplified speeches, simple language is used while talking to babies, complex language is avoided.
     Deletion of unstressed syllables, unstressed syllables are deleted.
     immediacy and concreteness, only those sentences are spoken that are present in the environment also parents air caretakers talk to children about the concrete things which they can touch and see.
     harmonization of vowels and consonants, substitutions of (w and j) in place of (l),
     the grammaticality of inputs, parents talk to children taking account of grammar, ungrammatical sentences are avoided by parents, even these kinds of sentences are spoken to them they do not imitate, and their acquisition remained unharmed

  • Analyzed: Hamlet Soliloquy and Element of de-familiarization by Shakespeare

    Analyzed: Hamlet Soliloquy and Element of de-familiarization by Shakespeare

    Cladiuss,


    Analyzation of the Soliloquy:
    The purpose of de-familiarization is to make something familiar, unfamiliar, it makes us see the world in a splendid or in a new fashion.to create the effect of de-familiarization writer uses various devices to create this effect. It is also the quality that literature possesses, by analyzing those devices that are used in poetry or in any other piece of writing we can find the element of de-familiarization.
    In Hamlet writer has used different metaphors, imageries, and personification to create that effect.

     To describe the hardships of life that are known to everyone but the way they are presented in this soliloquy makes this situation unknown and makes the reader to ponder upon that the writer wants to convey to us. By saying ‘to suffer/The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune in this metaphor fortune is compared to an army that throws arrows at one, also the metaphor or to take arms against the sea of troubles’, the use of imagery with connotations of war shows Hamlet to see life as a constant battle. The weapons mentioned are long-range suggesting the possibility of being unsuspecting of the attack. The adjectiveoutrageous is possibly used to emphasize the connotations of fortune as it can mean the inability to predict, but it also has connotations of being more than is required.

    Another device that is used is ‘we’’, he has used this w word to describe mankind's desires in the heartache of life.in this soliloquy bases form is used to universalize things in all ages for example ‘The’. We can also see the metaphor in which he has compared unknown life to the undiscovered city at the same time calamity metaphor is used in comparison with life and death as a quietus. This monologue contains the theme of the human condition of despair and the dangers and fears of what lies after death.
     Personification is also used, it can be seen in the following lines for who would bear the whips scorn of life’ time is personified so that it is capable of whipping and scorning. The concept of ‘kamaloka’ is resembling the concept of Shakespeare in his soliloquy, where he in state of fix, he is stuck in a state of whether to die or to live, whether to do or not to do, just like the concept of kamaloka, where a person is suspended somewhere in between heaven and hell.
    Hamlet, therefore, feels as though the odds are weighted against him. This is furthered by the metaphor used of a sea of troubles’ which equates his problem with the vast expanse of the sea and its power. These images are contrasted with Hamlet’s description of being ‘shuffled off this mortal coil’ as the verb ‘shuffle’ is usually linked to embarrassment or awkwardness. This betrays Hamlet’s views that much that we do is pointless; the heroic deeds we believe to have done are just little actions. The specific problems Hamlet experiences are hinted at by the ’thousand natural shocks that flesh is heir to’. Not only may this mean his mother’s incestuous marriage with Claudius that upsets Hamlet, but also his dead father who returns as a spirit telling him to avenge his death which causes much of Hamlet’s anguish. 

    This phrase may also mean the actual effects of aging or being wounded. Similarly, Hamlet calls life a ‘’calamity’ and a ‘mortal coil’; coil may mean literal coil which goes back on itself, it may mean confusion which is more probable meaning. Each of these examples demonstrates Hamlet’s view of the world as confusing and against him. The very reasons for this soliloquy show this as Hamlet is trying to reason with his conflicting thought and death.so, we can see how beautifully Shakespeare has described the inner state Hamlet and his confusion, it is creating a de-familiarized effect in a way that these things are very minute to think upon but when a reader goes through these lines, it made him/her stop and ponder upon the idea that a writer wants to convey through his character.

  • Stranger by Albert Camus; Symbolism

    Stranger by Albert Camus; Symbolism


    Symbolism in Camus novels play an important role, he uses different symbols to highlight different realities and uncovered different truths, he was a naturalist as well because of his love for nature, he added them as a result in his writings.
     There have been used various symbols including Sun the first and foremost major and quintessential symbol, at the same time different colors have used including red, green and white, the courtroom. Sunday, Arabs and Crucifix.
    While discussing the symbol of the sun, it shows Meursault's discomfort towards reality and his absurd feeling towards it, because whenever something happens to him Sun shines, sometimes he basks in it and another time he rebels it. It depicts the reality of the universe that man negates, and when it collides with man it creates absurdity. The bright light of sun shows indifferent behavior of Meursault towards nature, as when the flashing light of sun glared on his face he tries to hide his face, but when he finds out and confronts the absurdity of life he accepts it, although in various occasions in the novel he says to his coworker to turn off the light, he is more insensitive towards light than his mother’s funeral. That same light at the end of the novel become his friend because he accepts everything. The murder of Arab happens also in the sunlight, and the reason why he kills is because of sun, Arab also depicts his Sun-father. when he wishes it he wills Homoerotic relation with him and in final chapters, he attains comfort in nature by calling nature his 'brother’, so he befriends and becomes comfortable with its scheme. Nature appoints Meursault as an agent to destroy other beings as Sade remarks, according to him the reason behind his murder was nature destructive force, that is why when the court asks for the reason he is unable to defend himself and says 'It just happened that way''. Because nature was the driving force behind him.
     At the same time, sunlight on the sands and rivers made it more difficult for him to swim, see, walk and enjoy moments
    Another symbol that has been used is of Sunday, it signifies various things, as it is the symbol of Christ death, her mother’s funeral, killing of Arab, all the major incidents happened on this particular day, at the same time he is put to death on the same day, Christ and Meursault are similar in front of some scholars as some calls him as ''Christ as a human version of being, he shows the new testament of Christs in which he drinks alcohol and commits murder as human beings do frailty.
    While discussing the courtroom, it symbolized the society that contains order and rationality, but within a courtroom, he felt indifferent because they always inquire and investigate rational questions and are limited in their psyche.

    Different colors have been used in the novel, like red, green, white, that shows different aspects of Meursault and the universe and the connection of them with him, when he is angry, he becomes red and when in a calm mood the sky is shown as green because it symbolizes calmness, peace, and tranquility. the white color shows light of a sun that is unbearable, so the different colors of nature are variables that show certain human versus weather conditions.

    The sign of Crucifix is used as a sign of Christianity, as some of the scholars agrees upon the fact that he was more agnostic than Atheist and more non-Christian than Anti-Christ, as we can see in the novel he was called as ''Monsieur Antichrist'' because of his refusal to the existence and believing in God. by refusing him, people have refused to message of god because he was the Christ human version. In front of him, religion is a limitation a restriction that made people think in a certain way that is the case with Chaplain, in front of him he lacks his ability. Therefore, he is the depiction of Christ. and the dinner with Raymond is also symbolical in a way all the tragedy and destruction starts from that point. The bread and wine hosted by Raymond symbolized as Christ's blood and body and Meursault sweat in front of the sun at the same time. Raymond can be symbolized as evil because he seduced him to drink wine just like Satan forced Christ to disobey God's orders but he resurrected. Emmanuel's innocence can be regarded according to Biblical reference Isaiah; he is the opposite of Meursault.
    Arabs at the same time can be regarded symbol of the universe in which man always asks questions and it disappoints and remain silent, these Arabs can be regarded as the glimpse of universe, he also resembles them with his mother because she also remains silent.
  • Surrealism

    Surrealism


    Epitaph! lived in that age and for a thousand-year

    That  Epitaph is a clear depiction of surrealism, juxtaposition is one of the defining features of surrealism, and it has been used in this poem, we can see the two contradictory situations in which he states that he is dead and alive, these two are entirely different terms which are juxtaposed. Surrealism deals with dream and reality and in this poem, we can see that there is a dream about that age in which he had lived for a thousand years and making this picture a depiction of reality that is the feature of surrealism in which dream and reality fuse together. It does not deal with rationality just like he says
     'Am dead'  'I lived' these show irrational thoughts of the poet.

    The next juxtaposition is 'All human nobility being imprisoned' with 'I was free among masked slaves', these are two opposite situations in which he excludes his identity from all human nobility. Although he lived in the age of slavery where oppression can be seen but his freedom in that age is the reverse situation. So there is a reversal of the situation.
    The next irrational thought writer has depicted is of the earth the sky foiling around him and maintaining their equilibrium, the idea is over-exaggerated to express the thought that a writer wants to depict.

    At the end of the Epitaph, he is questioning about the struggle of that age in which he struggled and lived, this questioning is a sort of sarcastic and opposite at the same time because he just breathed and rebelled; this rebellion was against those slavish rules, not lived as he was supposed to just like others because in the earlier lines he stated that he never regards the rules of that slave society where everything seems to be violent. The juxtaposed situation can be seen over here. 
    At the end of the poem where he says 'you living, have no fear of me, I am dead' he expects from the people living that you must have fear of me because I am dead and gives the thought of elimination of everything that exists in life, so we can see life, death, and destruction of his own identity. This is one of the features of surrealism in which reality fuses with a dream, it seems like his dream where he is describing his thoughts. In this poem, there is no connection of thoughts that is the prime feature of this movement.
  • Modernism

    Modernism


             




    MODERNISM
    The origin of modernism, considered as an art and a philosophical movement is traced in North America and Europe in the late nineteenth-century and early twenties. There comes contradiction about the exact figures related to the beginning of modernism, yet it is generally accepted that the commencement of modern age is viewed in the 1880s or 1900. According to Virginia Woolf, the debatable point reaches the result that “human nature underwent a change in December 1910. It is between 1910 and 1930 that modernism became influential.
  • Death of Ivan Ilych

    Death of Ivan Ilych


    The 'Death of Ivan IIych' depicts the story of a man suffering from acute pain, and it unable to find escape in the tortures of his life, the only shelter he took was his own self and become a solitary, even though he departed himself from the social circle, but still he was having a common talk with his colleagues about the court, at the initial  stage of his life, he was as happy as he wished for and lived the life to his fullest, having all luxuries of his life, without having any glimpse of realization of what he was doing with his life, he was just living as it was supposed to, as others live; the concept of other in this Novella played a quintessential role, as he was living for others more than his own self, to show his repute to the society, and finally, become fully dependent on others for his treatment, Gerasim was the only one supporting him all the time, Illness triggered his inner thoughts to ponder and observe his life deeply and as it becomes more serious he also becomes more sensitive towards his thoughts, and questioned, '' Is there any meaning to life at all?'' that was the starting point in his life when he started observing the things, the materialistic things seem to him unworthy, the relationships, respect, popularity was lessening its importance in front of him because of the spirituality, the feeling of finding meaning in his life, he accepted them and tried to solve them also that nothing remains for so long. He was suffering more mentally. The foreshadowing in the novella depicts his thoughts, and his past memories, the life in which he had run for a long period of time now seem useless.
    For him, death becomes his being and it made more sense to him than anything, before that he was refusing the fact of death as we can see in the text when he was repeating the syllogism about mortality that he accepted about mortality, he was unable to apply on his own. But his illness, pain; that become much spiritual for him than physical, and concept of death that was abstract changed into concrete form.
    Spending his time in the dark continually for several days; as he was struggling, and dipped down in the dark cave but still questioning and thinking existentialists questions that he asks from himself become solved. And at the last moments of his life, he sees the light, all his suffering, pain, and pangs converted into blessing and pleasantness and gone forever. Here we also see Tolstoy depiction of his self, as he also realized all the phenomena of life until the last moment the ultimate reality that is death. But death is not the end, it’s another door towards heaven. The ‘light’ in the end serving as a seed sprouting from the soil, that first buries and then initiates new life, pessimism he viewed now transformed into happiness and optimism. His death also uncovers the existence of God in our lives that without believing on spirituality and on Him we are living like sloths having no aim and purpose, and the ‘Essentially’ of death, that we all will experience is inescapable, it is a saying, ‘’ Death is the ultimate possibility of my being’.
    Henceforth, Tolstoy gives his message in an ambiguous way through his character by portraying in a realist way.



  • GET A FREE QUOTE NOW

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat.

    Powered by Blogger.
    ADDRESS

    4759, NY 10011 Abia Martin Drive, Huston

    EMAIL

    contact-support@mail.com
    another@mail.com

    TELEPHONE

    +201 478 9800
    +501 478 9800

    MOBILE

    0177 7536213 44,
    017 775362 13